Taking photos in public of people and other things has always been murky waters for most photo takers. I have done it before and I'v seen everything from smiles to fingers (middle fingers). Once i was downtown taking a photo of my friend and there was some lady in the background, she asked me if she was in it. Being honest, i said yes. She yelled at me to delete it. Us photographers must stand up and use our rights! Here is some advice from an professional photographer.
The Ten Legal Commandments of Photography
I. Anyone in a public place can take pictures of anything they want. Public places include parks, sidewalks, malls, etc. Malls? Yeah. Even though it’s technically private property, being open to the public makes it public space.
II. If you are on public property, you can take pictures of private property. If a building, for example, is visible from the sidewalk, it’s fair game.
III. If you are on private property and are asked not to take pictures, you are obligated to honor that request. This includes posted signs.
IV. Sensitive government buildings (military bases, nuclear facilities) can prohibit photography if it is deemed a threat to national security.
V. People can be photographed if they are in public (without their consent) unless they have secluded themselves and can expect a reasonable degree of privacy. Kids swimming in a fountain? Okay. Somebody entering their PIN at the ATM? Not okay.
VI. The following can almost always be photographed from public places, despite popular opinion:
* accident & fire scenes, criminal activities
* bridges & other infrastructure, transportation facilities (i.e. airports)
* industrial facilities, Superfund sites
* public utilities, residential & commercial buildings
* children, celebrities, law enforcement officers
* UFOs, the Loch Ness Monster, Chuck Norris
VII. Although “security” is often given as the reason somebody doesn’t want you to take photos, it’s rarely valid. Taking a photo of a publicly visible subject does not constitute terrorism, nor does it infringe on a company’s trade secrets.
VIII. If you are challenged, you do not have to explain why you are taking pictures, nor to you have to disclose your identity (except in some cases when questioned by a law enforcement officer.)
IX. Private parties have very limited rights to detain you against your will, and can be subject to legal action if they harass you.
X. If someone tries to confiscate your camera and/or film, you don’t have to give it to them. If they take it by force or threaten you, they can be liable for things like theft and coercion. Even law enforcement officers need a court order.
Monday, February 1, 2010
Taking photos in Public
Labels:
Canon,
Constitution,
Law,
Nikon,
Photographer's Right,
Photography,
Powers,
Public Shooting,
US
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
"Kids swimming in a fountain? Okay"
ReplyDeleteno. not ok.
its photography, not stalking. if you a stalker/rapist/anything sketchy, its def not ok, but if your trying to get a good photo, thats ok, in my humble opinion.
ReplyDeleteSo I stumbled on your blog randomly (anything dealing with photo sorta attracts me..) and I was amused by your "commandments" of photography. So I was wondering if they are actual legit laws, or just kinda what you deem as appropriate or not.
ReplyDelete(i hope this wasn't too creepy/weird)-